Since 1977, Jon Michael Probstein has assisted people and businesses in all matters. In accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct, this may be deemed "Attorney Advertising". Nothing contained herein should be construed as legal advice. Admitted in New York and Massachusetts. Always consult a lawyer regarding any matter. Call 888 795-4555 or 212 972-3250 or 516 690-9780. Fax 212 202-6495. Email jmp@jmpattorney.com
Thursday, February 4, 2010
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE - CRIMINAL ACTS
Claimant is discharged because of an accused criminal act. Claimant is denied benefits for misconduct, and as a result, is homeless living in a shelter. Claimant requests hearing and is still denied benefits. A week after hearing, Claimant's criminal action is dismissed. Now what? Here are two Appeals Board decisions on this issue: For the sustainment of a charge of misconduct there must be clear proof that an act detrimental to employer's interests was indisputably committed by claimant. (A.B. 1008-39); Misconduct under the Law was established even though acts did not result in criminal conviction. (Ref. Dec. 532-78-39R. Principle confirmed by Matter of Colello, No.76-443 App. Div., 3rd Dept., Dec. 2, 1976, unreported).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.