Heydt-Benjamin v Heydt-Benjamin, 2015 NY Slip Op 02934, Decided on April 8, 2015 Appellate Division, Second Department:
"In addition, the court properly determined that the defendant alone was required to bear the obligation of repayment of the balance of her student loan because no benefit inured to the marriage (see Dashnaw v Dashnaw, 11 AD3d 732, 735; see also Mahoney-Buntzman v Buntzman, 12 NY3d 415, 422 n)."
Friday, June 26, 2015
OUTSTANDING STUDENT LOAN AND DIVORCE
Labels:
divorce,
Equitable Distribution,
Mariyal debt,
Student Loans
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.