A DISSENT ON ISSUE OF PRESERVING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CLAIM IN CHILD CUSTODY HEARING

Did the Mother preserve her claim for appeal purposes that the court failed to consider the effects of domestic violence on the best interests of the parties two young children in granting father primary physical custody, as required by Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1) (a)?

See the dissent in Jesse Cole v. Samantha Cole, Appellant. No. 67 SSM 8, New York State, Court of Appeals, Decided: June 23, 2020:

https://www.nycourts.gov/ctapps/Decisions/2020/Jun20/SSM8mem20-Decision.pdf.