BILL NUMBER: S6385B
SPONSOR: HOYLMAN TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the domestic relations law and the executive law, in relation to court ordered forensic evaluations involving child custody and visitation PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The purpose of this bill is to require child custody forensic evalu- ators that are appointed by the court to evaluate and investigate parties in a proceeding involving child custody and visitation to: (1) be a psychologist, social worker or psychiatrist, and (2) undergo bien- nial domestic violence-related training, also established by this bill, in order qualify for such appointment. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends subdivision 1 of section 240 of the domestic relations law to add a new paragraph (a-4) which states that a court may appoint a child custody forensic evaluator to evaluate and investigate the parties
and a child or children in a proceeding, provided such individual is a psychologist, social worker or psychiatrist who is licensed in the state of New York and has undergone the required biennial domestic violence- related training. The new paragraph requires a child custody forensic evaluator to-notify the court in which such individual requests to be considered for such court ordered evaluations; requires such individuals to notify the court should they fall out of compliance(regarding the biennial training requirement); and includes training documentation requirements. Section 2 amends subdivision three of section five hundred seventy-five of the executive law to add a new paragraph (n) to require the Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence (OPDV) to contract with the not-for-profit entity, the New York State Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NYSCADV) to develop a training program for psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, so that such individuals may conduct court ordered forensic evaluations involving child custody and visita- tion pursuant to the above section. The new paragraph lists the topics that shall be comprise such training, including but not limited to: relevant statutes, case law and psychological definitions of domestic violence, coercive control and child abuse; the dynamics and effects-of domestic violence and child abuse; trauma, particularly as it relates to sexual abuse and the risks posed to children and the long-term dangers and impacts imposed by the presence of adverse childhood experiences; and the danger of basing child custody decisions on claims that a child's deficient or negative relationship with a parent is caused by the other parent. The new paragraph requires the issuance of a certif- ication of completion for such course and requires OPDV to consult with NYSCADV to determine a reasonable number of training-hours that shall be required for the first instance such training is provided, and a reason- able number of training hours that shall be required for subsequent refresher courses that are provided to individuals taking them on a biennial basis. JUSTIFICATION: According to the Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE), a child advocacy not-for-profit organization that promotes judicial accountability and child safety, more than 700 children across the nation have been killed by a parent or parental-figure during circumstances involving divorce, separation, custody, visitation or child support since 2008. Addi- tionally, CJE has found that at least ninety-eight children in forty states have been killed by a parent or parental-figure after a family court allowed unsupervised contact with the child - after the court was informed beforehand about the parent's or parental-figure's violent history, mental illness, or risk of harming a child. In New York Family Court, custody of a child can be heavily influenced by court appointed Forensic Evaluators, though their training or educa- tional and professional experiences vary greatly across the state. Even though these court appointed evaluators typically conduct mental health evaluations, they are currently not required to be licensed mental health professionals. They produce forensic reports that are often foun- dational in informing the court's decision of a custody or visitation dispute. Currently no mandatory standards or trainings exist for court appointed evaluators, nor are they established for competence in the nuances of domestic violence involved child custody cases. Tragically, and despite the existence of an evaluative process, there have been many instances in New York where children have been killed after the court granted unsupervised visitation to their murderer. In an effort to address this deficiency in the court system, this bill would require evaluators appointed on behalf of the court to be a psychologist, social worker or psychiatrist who has undergone the required biennial domestic violence-related training. The bill requires the Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence (OPDV) to contract with the New York State Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NYSCADV) to develop a training program for such individuals that covers various aspects related to domestic violence. As an organization that is desig- nated by the federal Department of Health and Human Services to coordi- nate statewide improvements within local communities, social service systems, and programming regarding the prevention and intervention of domestic violence, NYSCADV has experience in providing domestic violence related training and has been included in recent chapters requiring such training in other sectors (see chapter 715 of 2019 and chapter 391 of 2019). With training and an awareness of the impact domestic violence has on victims (among other specific topics), custody evaluators will be better prepared to provide evaluations that are in the best interest of the child. Finally, this bill's requirements are an ac knowledgement of a 2018 congressional resolution (H.Con.Res.72), which urged state courts to make child safety the first priority of court decisions involving custody and parenting. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2019-20 - A.9888 - referred to judiciary FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Undetermined. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect 180 days after it shall become law; provided, however, that effective immediately: the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act by the chief administrator of the courts, with the approval of the administrative board of the courts, on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such effective date.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.